← All topics (review home)

Skill: write-like-james @ 58d971a · typed hard types: write-mcqs @ 58d971a

Topic 14 "Light bounces off, changes direction or soaks in" — your read (28 September 2026, night; your Physics review of 29 September applied)

Your 29 September rulings, applied — and three questions they leave (reply by letter)

Light changes direction at water or glass everywhere in the topic now (L02 is "Light changes direction"; the pencil and straw still look bent); reflection is one direction on every drawing and in every sentence — one line in, one line out, at equal angles, and "in every direction" is gone; the kettle and pencil items are hard; the pool item's key is your sentence; the shell item names the crossing; Rashid's shop window is deleted; no figure draws a hand. Record: JAMES_FEEDBACK_G3T14_2026-09-29.md.

A. The white wall. Lesson 1's "not just mirrors" case kept the white wall — drawn now as ONE line in and ONE line out at equal angles, up to a lit patch on the ceiling — because the belief it breaks (only mirrors reflect) needs a dull surface, and the vault's reading of your ruling keeps a wall with one ray in, one ray out. In truth a wall scatters. Keep the wall drawn this way / swap it for a shiny non-mirror (a white tile, a steel pan) / say another scene. Recommendation: keep the wall.

B. The recap in later grades. "Refracted, reflected, absorbed — tricky! Fine, but let's make sure when we cover this again in the future grades we recap these terms." The note is written for the coordinator to carry to the Grade 4 and Grade 5 plans: the first light lesson in each grade opens with a recall of the three verbs, plain word first. Fine / say where else.

C. The type sheet after your cuts. Type 8 (Rashid) is struck, so reflection (ENE3-013) has no pair type; the kettle (type 4) and pencil (type 5) moved to hard, so the sort atom (ENE3-016) and refraction (ENE3-014) have no easy type. Generate the bank from the seven types as they stand / add back an EASY four-option sort (a fresh case → reflected / refracted / absorbed) and an EASY refraction "what happens" / say which.


Five short lessons: light bounces off (reflection) · what you see in a mirror · light bends (refraction) · light soaks in (absorption) · sort what light did. Written by the author as you, then a non-author review (32 findings, 30 applied, 2 left for you) and one cold read of every changed or new item (39 of 39 keys agreed; 11 wording flags, 9 applied). Reply by number.

The three that need your word

1. Do you accept the split of Lesson 1, and the new atom that comes with it (ENE3-P02, "What you see in a mirror")?

Lesson 1 taught "light bounces off" on a mirror, a white wall and a red book. Its article also carried the two mirror cases children get wrong most — they think the cat they see is behind the glass, and that a mirror gives out light — but the 148-word video could not hold them, and the quiz tested them anyway. Video or article is the learner's choice, so the video must carry what the quiz tests.

The coordinator ruled for the split you used in Topic 3: a second short lesson, L01b "What you see in a mirror" (the cat: light from the cat bounces off the mirror to your eye, so what you see is a picture; the same mirror in a room with no light shows nothing — a mirror does not make light). It is built: a 142-word video, its own question, ten quiz items.

Topic 3's pattern is that a new lesson gets a proposed atom and you rule on the id. The proposal, with three ideas considered and set aside

Recommendation: accept the split and the atom. Accept both / keep the lesson, strike the atom (L01b sits under ENE3-013) / merge back

2. Is "most of the light" the sentence you want for dark and light things?

Lesson 3 says a black shirt soaks up most of the light and a little still bounces off — that is why you can see it — and a white shirt bounces most of it off. It is the honest grade-3 model, and it is what keeps "you can still see a black cat" true.

The cost is discipline: every question after Lesson 3 that offers "soaks in" as an option now asks what most of the light did.

The plainer alternative — dark things soak light in, light things bounce it off, no "most" — is simpler to say and quietly false (a black thing would bounce no light, so you could not see it).

Recommendation: keep "most". Keep / plain "soaks in / bounces off"

3. Do the eight question types stand — and the two typed hard items in particular?

Your ruling of tonight is applied: the bank's hard items are text entry. Both were re-authored after the review so that neither stem does the student's thinking:

Six easy and medium types are four-option multiple choice; every atom is tested alone and in a pair; no atom carries more than two types. The type sheet

Approve / edit / strike types by number

The lessons, one line each

The topic as a student sees it · The plan

Two small things the reviewers left for you

Rulings applied without asking

Hard PP100 items typed · attached questions stand alone with their own drawing (five, plus three on the summary) · no verdict-plus-reason options · positive stems · options parallel in kind · colour in figures (black and white shirts drawn black and white) · "the X" drawn where it is named · scripts under 150 words (148 / 142 / 150 / 149 / 147) · intro on a ready line and a poll · Topic 13's words (a light source makes light; light travels straight until it hits something; you see a thing when light from it reaches your eye; no line ever leaves an eye — the cat's line now leaves its back) · the eye drawn as a plain eye symbol on the ray diagrams (Topic 13's own figures still show a head; noted for its owner) · "into or out of" for refraction · "most of the light" in every ask after Lesson 3 · US words (flashlight, color, gray, wading pool, tide pool).

<details><summary>Checks run</summary>

</details>